5 Disturbing Facts Surrounding the Murder of Dan Brophy

Dan Brophy, an instructor at the Oregon Culinary Institute, was an integral part of the Portland metropolitan community. He was about to deliver a lecture in Kitchen One at the institute when his body was tragically discovered by students. Dan was shot twice in the back and died almost instantly due to the bullets striking his heart.

The investigation into his murder brought to light disturbing information about Nancy Crampton-Brophy, a romance novelist known for her essay titled “How to Murder Your Husband.”The case quickly became sensational due to its strange twists and shocking details.

NBC Dateline featured this case in an episode called “Murder in Kitchen One,” which explores the intricacies of the investigation and the subsequent trial. Oxygen is set to reair this episode on September 18 at 5:00 a.m. Below are five chilling facts surrounding the murder of Dan Brophy.

5 Shocking Details About Dan Brophy’s Murder

1) The Silent and Sudden Attack

Dan Brophy’s kill…

Dan Brophy was murdered in the early hours of June 2, 2018, at his workplace. As he was getting ready for the day, he was shot twice in the back with a 9mm pistol. The attack was swift and precise, likely preventing Dan from seeing his assailant.

The bullets pierced his heart, causing instantaneous death. Investigators believed the killer was familiar with Dan’s schedule, as there was no evidence of struggle or defense.

2) Lack of Physical Evidence

No significant physical evidence was found at the crime scene of the Oregon Culinary Institute. Despite extensive inquiries and investigations, detectives did not uncover any usable fingerprints, DNA, or security footage that could identify the suspect.

The absence of surveillance cameras at the institute hindered the investigation further. Initially, this lack of evidence complicated the authorities’ ability to construct a case, but eventually, they honed in on an unexpected suspect.

3) Nancy Crampton-Brophy’s Suspicious Behavior

Despite a clean crime scene, suspicion quickly fell on Nancy Crampton-Brophy, Dan’s wife. In her 2011 blog post titled “How to Murder Your Husband,”she described circumstances eerily reminiscent of her husband’s death.

Nancy’s eerie essay…

While this essay could not be used as evidence in court, it added a disturbing layer to the case. Additionally, just weeks before the murder, Nancy purchased a 9mm handgun—matching the weapon used in Dan’s killing—and an untraceable firearm kit online.

4) Financial Motive and Inconsistent Testimonies

Financial motives also came into play for Nancy. She stood to gain $1.2 million from Dan Brophy’s life insurance policy and their $300,000 home, potentially providing her financial security. Surveillance footage captured Nancy driving near the culinary institute around the time of the murder, raising further suspicions of her involvement.

Although she initially claimed not to have been in the area, Nancy later suggested that her presence was probably a coincidence, perhaps a mere coffee run or a moment of inspiration for her writing.

5) The Missing Murder Weapon

The missing weapon…

Neither the murder weapon nor any related firearms were recovered from the crime scene or later. Although Nancy owned a similar 9mm pistol, authorities could not locate the specific gun used in the murder. Nancy’s defense argued that the absence of a murder weapon dismantled any potential evidence linking her to the crime.

Ultimately, it was the circumstantial evidence—such as her presence near the crime scene, a potential financial motive, and the acquisition of an untraceable gun kit—that led to the jury’s conclusions. Furthermore, Nancy’s inconsistent statements regarding the incident did not help her case.

The murder of Dan Brophy remains a haunting betrayal and mystery. Nancy Crampton-Brophy was convicted of second-degree murder in May 2022, concluding a case that captured public attention for nearly four years. Although the murder weapon was never found and Nancy continued to profess her innocence, the circumstantial evidence painted a compelling picture of guilt.

Source