Amid its already polarized reception, It Ends with Us has recently become the center of a significant legal controversy. Based on Colleen Hoover’s bestselling novel, this romantic drama stars Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni as Lily and Ryle, a couple whose relationship faces turmoil due to the reemergence of Lily’s first love and Ryle’s troubling behaviors reminiscent of her parents’ abusive relationship. Directed by Baldoni, the film experienced notable box office success, despite receiving mixed reviews from critics.
In a striking development, Blake Lively has initiated a lawsuit against Justin Baldoni, alleging sexual harassment and a hostile work environment at his production company, Wayfarer Studios. This information, reported by The Hollywood Reporter, outlines how Lively’s concerns necessitated an “all-hands-on-deck meeting,”indicating the seriousness of the situation.
An Overview of Lively’s Lawsuit Against Baldoni
Allegations Suggesting Preemptive Measures
Reportedly, Lively’s lawsuit includes explicit concerns regarding on-set conduct, such as the prohibition of showing nude content in front of her and avoiding discussions of Baldoni’s alleged past issues, including a supposed “pornography addiction.”Other directives noted in the documents range from refraining from commenting on Lively’s weight to halting any unsanctioned sexual content creation during filming.
The lawsuit claims that while Wayfarer agreed to Lively’s stipulations, Baldoni prioritized dramatic promotional narratives over the agreed focus on female empowerment, which may have contributed to rifts between him and other cast members who reportedly unfollowed him on social media. Additionally, Lively’s suit asserts that Baldoni exploited the story’s themes of domestic violence for personal gain, engaging in what is characterized as a “social manipulation”effort aimed at undermining Lively’s image.
As news of the lawsuit broke, Baldoni’s representation agency, WME, terminated its association with him. An investigative piece by the New York Times unveiled that Lively had access to thousands of internal communications—text messages and emails—uncovered through a subpoena, revealing that Baldoni and producer Jamey Heath employed crisis management expert Melissa Nathan to damage Lively’s reputation.
The rebuttal from Wayfarer’s attorney, Bryan Freedman, accused Lively of fabricating claims to salvage her own negative public perception, stating:
These claims are completely false, outrageous, and intentionally salacious with an intent to publicly hurt and rehash a narrative in the media. [Ms. Lively planted] negative and completely fabricated and false stories with media [about Mr. Baldoni, which] was another reason why Wayfarer Studios made the decision to hire a crisis professional.
Lively’s response reflects her hope that her legal actions can illuminate retaliatory tactics within industries that seek to silence those who report misconduct:
I hope that my legal action helps pull back the curtain on these sinister retaliatory tactics to harm people who speak up about misconduct and helps protect others who may be targeted.
After the initial turbulence, Lively reportedly regained her comfort on set and worked with Sony to produce her own version of It Ends with Us, which incorporated fresh editing and even a Taylor Swift track. Ultimately, the studio backed her cut of the film, granting her a producer credit.
Despite working alongside Nathan, who suggested points of contention regarding Lively’s influence in the film’s development, Baldoni appeared to desire even more sensational narratives that could mirror high-profile media feuds. Reports indicated potential discussions suggesting smear campaigns against Lively, including planting negative press pieces.
Although it remains uncertain how much of the adverse publicity directed towards Lively was orchestrated, communications between Baldoni’s team reveal a troubling enthusiasm regarding her negative reception:
And socials are really really ramping up. In his favour, she must be furious. It’s actually sad because it just shows you have people really want to hate on women.
As the controversy unfolds, insight drawn from a report by Terakeet indicates that Lively was subjected to a “targeted, multichannel online attack,”evident in a staggering 35% of the Google search results featuring her name referencing Baldoni—an anomaly given her long-standing career.
Implications for It Ends with Us
A Damaged Legacy for the Film
With Lively’s lawsuit freshly filed, the public’s allegiances remain to be determined. The involvement of Melissa Nathan, who previously handled publicity during sensational celebrity scandals, like Johnny Depp’s divorce from Amber Heard, suggests that the currents surrounding this case may shift continually as more unfolds. Notably, data comparisons indicate that Lively’s situation parallels the media frenzy surrounding Heard during her trial.
This transition stands to complicate It Ends With Us‘ overall legacy. The film’s portrayal of domestic violence has already been a point of contention, as many viewers feel it romanticizes the unhealthy dynamics of the main characters. Coupled with an aggressive marketing focus on romance and eroticism, it has sparked significant debate—though not entirely positive.
As tensions escalate between Baldoni and Lively, the fate of the proposed continuation project, It Starts with Us, appears uncertain. With Baldoni currently holding the adaptation rights, the evolution of their conflict could inhibit any future collaborative efforts, potentially casting a shadow over both the film’s reputation and Hoover’s sequel.
For ongoing coverage and insights, refer to the following sources: THR and NY Times.
Leave a Reply