The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom is widely acclaimed as one of the standout titles for the Nintendo Switch. I was captivated upon my initial experience, soaring above Hyrule’s vast expanse, filled with anticipation at what the game had to offer. However, after some time away from the pre-release excitement, my perspective on the game has evolved significantly.
While my views diverge from the overwhelmingly positive reviews that celebrated the game, I do not detest it. In fact, there are numerous aspects of Tears of the Kingdom that I genuinely appreciate, many of which echo the beloved features of Breath of the Wild. Yet, through careful contemplation of my experience, I’ve concluded that Nintendo’s emphasis on mechanical creativity may not have been necessary for this sequel.
Tears of the Kingdom: Not Living Up to Its Potential
A Game of Iteration, Not Innovation
It’s important to clarify that I don’t consider Tears of the Kingdom to be merely an expanded DLC. The game effectively fulfills a sequel’s duty by introducing new mechanics, narratives, and characters while building on the original’s foundation. I commend its effort to revitalize Hyrule, even though I believe future Zelda titles should explore new locales.
Despite its initial promise, I found Tears of the Kingdom to be an experience that gradually revealed its limitations. Similar to Animal Crossing: New Horizons, it appeared to have boundless potential, yet with further exploration, I sensed a diminishing depth.
Recognizing the monumental expectations set by its predecessor, it was evident that fans anticipated a game that would surpass its predecessor with groundbreaking ideas. In line with this, Nintendo unleashed a wave of creativity in Tears of the Kingdom, introducing mechanisms like Ultrahand that touched nearly every aspect of the gameplay experience.
During my initial playthrough, I immersed myself in each new mechanic, approaching both new and familiar content with fresh enthusiasm. However, despite my efforts to engage with the game’s narrative, it never fully resonated. The experience, while deeply engaging, felt somewhat superficial as I delved deeper into its components.
An effective sequel builds on the core strengths of its predecessor without compromising them. While innovation is crucial, maintaining the essence of what made the original special is equally important. For instance, the Marvel’s Spider-Man series manages to retain its foundational elements across its sequels. On the contrary, Tears of the Kingdom seems to have overshadowed the elements that made Breath of the Wild extraordinary—its atmosphere, sense of exploration, and the inspiring wonder of its vast world.
Nintendo’s Misplaced Priorities
Emphasizing Creativity Over Atmosphere
While many gamers have crafted intricate designs using the Ultrahand, I found that this creativity-focused mechanic often detracted from the core elements that made Breath of the Wild groundbreaking. Nintendo’s fixation on innovative features, although resonant with the spirit of the original Zelda games, often felt misaligned with the open-world framework of Tears of the Kingdom.
Creating a vehicle for quick traversal was certainly exciting, yet it stripped away much of the game’s atmospheric tension. Constructing makeshift flying machines from Zonai parts was novel at first, but it conflicted with the sense of desolation that characterized the game world. Each time I was compelled to rely on this mechanic, an initial thrill quickly morphed into disappointment, revealing that this was not how I wanted to experience the game.
The introduction of numerous variables in puzzles often led to convoluted solutions. Furthermore, unlimited weapon combinations diluted their significance, and exploration became daunting with the overwhelming creative potential at hand. While I genuinely appreciate the value that Ultrahand brings to the gameplay, I can’t ignore the considerable loss it inflicts on the overall experience.
I find it problematic to critique Nintendo for attempting something innovative, especially when they’ve consistently excelled in breaking traditional gaming boundaries from the classic Mario series through to Breath of the Wild. However, I contend that the focus on creative mechanics came at the cost of enhancing the established gameplay formula.
A Call for Evolution in the Switch 2
The Risk of Gimmickry
It is worth mentioning that Animal Crossing: New Horizons suffers from a similar issue. By shifting attention away from engaging villager interactions—hallmarks of one of the best life simulation titles—it embraced a model of unrestricted island customization, a change that feels more suited for a spin-off than a main title.
Similarly, envision a sequel to Stardew Valley that completely eliminates meaningful character interactions in favor of deeper farming mechanics; such a shift would fundamentally alter the essence of the game. While I encourage Nintendo’s creative aspirations, I worry that this trend, particularly within the Zelda series, could lead to a diminishment in the core elements that define its titles, especially with the anticipated Switch 2.
In essence, Nintendo need not abandon its penchant for innovation; rather, it should delineate the difference between gameplay-oriented experiences and those that prioritize atmosphere and narrative depth. Tears of the Kingdom should have embraced a more enriching narrative that explored the complexities of Zelda lore while expanding upon the established world of Breath of the Wild. I hope for a future where Nintendo can better differentiate between its atmosphere-driven titles and those designed for mechanical exploration.
Source: Nintendo of America/YouTube
Leave a Reply