Explained: The Ending of Leave The World Behind

The film Leave the World Behind, a Netflix original directed by Sam Esmail and based on Rumaan Alam’s novel, culminates in a dramatic sequence that sees New York City under siege. As chaos unfolds outside, Amanda (played by Julia Roberts) discovers refuge in the Thorne family’s bunker, where her daughter Rose seeks solace by watching *Friends*. This film is part of Netflix’s partnership with Barack and Michelle Obama and boasts an impressive cast that includes Ethan Hawke, Mahershala Ali, and Kevin Bacon.

The story begins with Amanda and her family arriving for a vacation, only to encounter immediate turmoil when a significant cyberattack disrupts all forms of communication. This prompt return home of the Thorne family, represented by the homeowner George Scott (Mahershala Ali) and his daughter Ruth (Myha’la), complicates their situation. The two families struggle with mistrust amidst escalating threats, culminating in a sequence where Clay Sandford (Ethan Hawke) and George seek medical help from neighbor Danny (Kevin Bacon). Their journey leads to Rose discovering the bunker, initially for the purpose of enjoying the finale of *Friends*.

Understanding Leave the World Behind’s Five-Part Structure

GH’s Insights to Clay

The narrative structure of Leave the World Behind consists of five segments, each labeled with distinctive titles: Part I: The House, Part II: The Curve, Part III: The Noise, Part IV: The Flood, and Part V: The End. The arrangement serves a dual purpose, illustrating specific narrative events while also echoing deeper thematic elements. The initial two parts act as preambles, while the latter three reflect stages of crisis as explained by GH to Clay while they confront the disarray surrounding them.

Namely, the stages include: Stage 1—Isolation, aimed at rendering the target incapacitated, correlating closely with “The Noise”in Part III. Stage 2 describes Synchronized Chaos, marked by coordinated attacks and misinformation, represented by “The Flood”in Part IV. Finally, Stage 3 refers to a Coup d’État, aligning with “The Last One” in Part V. Although three parts could encapsulate the story adequately, the inclusion of the first two sets the necessary groundwork.

Unusual Animal Behavior Explained

Flamingos as Symbols of Environmental Distress

After witnessing the unsettling sight of a White Lion oil tanker washed ashore, the Sandfords’ attention is drawn to an ill omen in the form of a deer herd in their backyard. Initially dismissed by Clay as a good sign based on mythology, the presence of deer leads to a series of ominous events. Other wildlife, including flamingos, further symbolizes environmental chaos when observed landing in a swimming pool. Late in the narrative, this threatening behavior reaches an unsettling crescendo.

Although the exact cause behind this unusual animal behavior remains elusive, hints suggest severe environmental repercussions. As Clay ventures into town, he encounters a car radio broadcasting warnings of a catastrophic environmental disaster linked to the cyberattack, implicating animal migration disruptions. Given the proximity of possible disasters, such as oil spills originating from Florida, it’s plausible that these phenomena influenced the unexpected presence of the flamingos in New York.

Danny’s Foreknowledge of the Attack

Was Danny Just Paranoid?

Amanda’s initial encounter in town reveals Danny (Kevin Bacon) preparing his truck with supplies, an early indication of his awareness of impending chaos. While George had insight due to market behaviors and intel from influential friends, Danny lacked such connections yet exhibited a strong resolve to prepare for the unknown.

Decoding the Ending and its Significance

The character development within Leave the World Behind, especially that of Amanda and Ruth, underlines its explorations of the human experience. Their initial conflicts give way to insight, leading to the realization that cooperation is crucial for survival. This transformation is cemented when Amanda acknowledges their shared delusions about humanity’s darker aspects.

Rose’s fixation on *Friends* serves as both a thematic element and a narrative critique. Through the lens of this beloved sitcom, the film reflects on media’s role in offering both escape and a stark reflection of reality, paralleling the story’s sinister backdrop. While the world crumbles around them, Rose yearns to witness the series’ conclusion, embodying nostalgia for an idealized past as articulated by Ruth.

In the finale, as societal collapse envelops New York, Rose seeks comfort in the Thornes’ bunker, drawn by its DVD collection featuring *Friends*. The stark contrast between her trivial pursuit and the unfolding chaos raises poignant questions about escapism amid turmoil. Her choice to dive into the finale underscores the film’s duality—simultaneously a gripping thriller and a lens of human truth.

Comparing the Ending in the Film and the Book

Adaptation: Mixed Reactions to Choices

While the film adaptation of Leave the World Behind incorporated numerous changes, one of the most contentious was its resolution. In the movie, Rose’s focus shifts solely to watching the *Friends* finale, abruptly concluding the narrative. Contrarily, in the novel, Rose plays a more proactive role, helping her family gather supplies for survival, showcasing a shift from the film’s exploratory approach to a more action-oriented depiction.

This alteration prompted widespread discussion; many viewers expressed discontent with the film’s ambiguous closure. Director Sam Esmail addressed this in interviews, suggesting that he intentionally pursued a provocative ending rather than the typical disaster film conclusion.

“We knew going into this that the ending was going to be polarizing, but we did not want to pull punches on it. I think in a traditional disaster film, a genre that I’m a huge fan of, so no knock on disaster films — I mean, *Day After Tomorrow* is one of my favorite movies — but the expectation is at the end of these films, your cast of characters overcome the disaster, and the world reverts back to some sane semblance of normalcy. I knew that I wasn’t going to do that.”

Despite mixed feedback, the film holds a 74% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, though audience reception stands at only 36%. This disparity highlights the divide between critical acclaim and viewer satisfaction, particularly surrounding the film’s ending.

Author Rumaan Alam’s Perspective on the Film’s Conclusion

Alam Supports the Film’s Direction

Mahershala Ali and Julia Roberts looking shocked in Leave the World Behind

Rumaan Alam, who also served as an executive producer on the film, expressed a favorable view of Esmail’s ending alterations during an interview with Variety. His insights suggest a belief that the artistic decisions foster a deeper reflection on the themes presented in the story, providing a unique lens through which to view the characters’ experiences.

“It’s sort of self-reflective because he’s a filmmaker. He’s also worked in television, and he’s sort of asserting something about the power of that medium, and its hold over this one character… The theatrical experience of watching this movie is so powerful because I’ve had the chance to see audiences respond to the ending three times now, and nobody really knows what to make of it. They’re like, is this funny? Is this scary? Is it really over? And I love that so much.”

While criticisms may exist regarding the emotional ambiguity of the ending compared to the book, Alam remains optimistic, maintaining that the varied interpretations offer a richer discussion about the characters’ fates post-film.

“In the film, they set that timer, and so there’s a literal ticking clock… I have this vision of G.H. as so competent, and I feel like he’s solved every problem. But I don’t know what’s going to happen to Archie… This is open enough that it becomes something that is possessed by its audience.”

Director Sam Esmail on the Film’s Climax

Esmail’s Insights into the Ending

Farrah Mackenzie as Rose Sandford gazing at a massive DVD collection the doomsday bunker in Leave the World Behind

In light of the film’s ambiguous ending, director Sam Esmail has engaged in discussions concerning its climax in various interviews. He has provided insights into the reasoning behind featuring *Friends* prominently in the final scenes. Esmail reflects on the importance of the show’s iconic theme song and lyrics, suggesting they align perfectly with the film’s denouement.

“Choosing which sitcom to focus on at the end of *Leave the World Behind* was a big conversation… after we ran through other options, I think I looked at the team and I said, ‘I don’t think we can afford to lose *Friends*.’”

Moreover, Esmail has discussed broader adaptation choices, emphasizing the need for creative reinterpretation when transitioning from literature to film. He argues for a nuanced approach that considers the differing expectations held by audience members across mediums.

“It shouldn’t work! It’s so great in the medium for a reason. You have to figure out a different way to mine the same character… If you do this one-to-one thing, I think nine times out of ten you’re gonna fail.”

Reception of the Film’s Ending

Diverse Reactions Based on Familiarity with the Source

The White Lion cargo ship speeds towards the beach in Leave the World Behind

The adaptation’s conclusion has sparked varied reactions, particularly among viewers unfamiliar with Rumaan Alam’s novel. Critics who approached the film devoid of preconceived notions generally responded favorably, granting it a solid 74% rating on Rotten Tomatoes. However, audience critiques tell a different story, with a polarized 36% score.

Notably, some reviewers highlighted the film’s conclusion as one of its strongest elements. Julian Leu from The Monthly Film Festival praised how character dynamics evolve, stating,

“It’s great to witness how these dynamics evolve… Yes, it’s as humane as this – sheer hedonism… But it’s quite ironic that a lot of people didn’t enjoy the ending, because I think the ending perfectly encapsulates the essence of the film.”

While some critics offered a more tempered critique on the ending, acknowledging the thoughtful exploration of crisis themes, there remains notable emphasis on the film’s underlying messages and character complexities.

“The themes of *Leave the World Behind* — and the place where everything ends up… are worth considering in our current time. They could also be handled far worse…”

Source & Images