Jude Law Explains What Sets Husk Apart from Bob Matthews in The Order’s Mafia Story

Warning: SPOILERS ahead for The Order!

The Order: Exploring the Distinction Between Terry Husk and Bob Matthews

Jude Law, a prominent star of The Order, recently revealed how a pivotal mafia story shared by his character, Terry Husk, sets him apart from Bob Matthews, portrayed by Nicholas Hoult. Set against a backdrop of real events, this action thriller transports viewers to Idaho in 1983, where Husk, an FBI agent, grapples with a network of criminal enterprises believed to be orchestrated by a singular organized group. His investigation ultimately leads to Bob Matthews, the leader of a neo-Nazi white supremacist crime syndicate.

A Moment of Insight: Husk’s Mafia Story

In an interview with Screen Rant, Law elaborates on the significance of Husk’s mafia anecdote during a compelling scene with young police officer Jamie (played by Tye Sheridan). Law acknowledges the commonalities between both characters—each is driven and adept at enlisting others into their respective causes by appealing to their “beliefs and goodwill.”Nonetheless, a stark contrast surfaces: Husk’s transparency regarding his emotions and the inherent risks of his profession, which stands in sharp opposition to Bob’s manipulative greed that views human life as a mere tool for personal advantage.

They’re two sides of the same coin, I suppose, because the similarities are that they’re both driven individuals, and they’re both people who have a cause and a belief that they will give everything up for. You are right, they recruit and draw on other people’s beliefs and goodwill. I suppose the difference is there’s a certain amount of knowledge that Terry Husk has that he’s bringing people into a fold of danger and risk. He almost warns off Jamie, the role that Tye Sheridan plays, from getting too involved emotionally.

Husk wears his own suffering life as a badge, as a demonstration, whereas Mathews uses it almost like he uses his acolytes, almost greedily. He knows that they’re going to lose their lives, but he goes in goading them that they’re living a better life and that they’re going to have some great end. So, there’s falsity and honesty.

The Dichotomy of Order and Chaos

Husk and Bob: Representations of Law and Crime

Throughout The Order, the character dynamics between Husk and Bob become increasingly pronounced. Their ultimate confrontation occurs amidst flames, with an unexpected twist—Bob succumbs to smoke inhalation rather than falling to Husk’s hand. This climax epitomizes their divergent philosophies, both embodying contrasting belief systems focused on the manipulation of others for different ends.

What distinguishes Husk is his genuine commitment to safeguarding others, illustrating that while his work often requires a level of control, it is rooted in altruistic intentions. In stark contrast, Bob’s ideology derives from a twisted neo-Nazi perspective, heavily influenced by William Luther Pierce’s controversial novel The Turner Diaries. Bob’s actions reflect a self-serving survival instinct, preying on the discontent of others to amass followers willing to act on their anger.

Analyzing the Conflict: Husk vs. Bob

Clear Opposition Underlines The Narrative Drive

The duality of Husk and Bob emerges clearly through the narrative, with their respective responses to crisis further delineating their boundaries. The film has garnered positive reviews, emphasizing how it artfully depicts their moral divergences, making it both symbolically potent and cohesive within the storyline. Their contrasting worldviews culminate in reactions that highlight their profound separation of morals and motivations.

Directed by Justin Kurzel, known for his earlier works such as Macbeth and Nitram, The Order delves into the complex interplay between good and evil, bringing forth the elaborate interplay between both characters.

Source&Images