Batman stands out as one of the most iconic figures in DC Comics, with his popularity rivaling only that of Superman. Yet, a peculiar chapter in comic book lore reveals that there was a period when the editorial team at DC held the bizarre belief that the Dark Knight should never be depicted sitting down. This revelation comes from Paul Jenkins, a former writer for DC, who shared his surprising experiences in an open letter to fans.
As highlighted in a report by Bleeding Cool, Jenkins recounted his decision to step away from his roles at both Marvel and DC. Alongside his commentary, he humorously noted the peculiar feedback he received from DC editors regarding his portrayal of Batman.
It seems that DC operated under an unspoken guideline asserting that Bruce Wayne’s persona should never allow him to take a seat. Despite Jenkins’ differing opinion, the Caped Crusader’s rigorous training and endurance were deemed incompatible with any moment of stillness.
Paul Jenkins Unveils the Editorial Backlash Against Batman Sitting
DC Comics’ Reluctance to Allow the Caped Crusader a Moment of Rest
Batman is known for achieving extraordinary physical feats that border on superhuman capabilities. His extreme regimen includes power naps and controlled heart rates to sustain his vigilante activities. With such intensity in his lifestyle, it partially makes sense for Bruce Wayne to be portrayed as someone who hardly ever takes a moment to sit down. However, DC’s rigid enforcement of this “no-sitting”doctrine not only hindered creative expression but also led to an unrealistic image of Batman.
I would like to relay an editorial comment that I received near the end of my time writing the Dark Knight New 52 series. In one scene, I had written that Batman is sitting on a rooftop during an intense conversation, close to a person who has been injured. The editorial comment: “We’re not sure you are ‘getting’ the character because it’s common knowledge that Batman never sits down.”This, mind you, after I had made it clear I was not going to rewrite material for the umpteenth time after it had already been approved.
Jenkins emphasized that numerous acclaimed Batman stories, such as The Dark Knight Strikes Again and The Killing Joke, show Bruce Wayne seated at pivotal moments. The idea that Batman could never sit is even more far-fetched when considering his iconic kneeling scenes over Gotham, sitting at the Justice League table, or using his Batcomputer in the Batcave. This restriction not only complicated artistic renditions of Batman but also ignored many memorable instances within the comics.
The “Batman Doesn’t Sit”Rule Reflects the Rigid Standards in Crafting a Comic Legend
Paul Jenkins Highlights the Behind-the-Scenes Challenges of Writing the Caped Crusader
Jenkins’ reflections on his tenure writing Batman shine a light on the rigorous oversight many creative professionals face when depicting high-profile superhero characters. The notion of a “no-sitting” rule may sound absurd, yet it serves as a glimpse into DC Comics’ desire to tightly control Batman’s portrayal—a strategy that may seem excessive for a character who embodies versatility in storytelling.
Though one could rationalize Bruce Wayne’s chaotic lifestyle as a reason for seldom sitting, enforcing such a rule seems overly restrictive. Jenkins’ commentary offers a fascinating peek into past editorial practices at DC Comics, making it clear why the company ultimately reconsidered its odd stance on Batman’s portrayal.
For further insights, visit Bleedingcool.com.
Leave a Reply