Why A Court Of Thorns & Roses Should Have Emulated The Best Elements From Sarah J. Maas’ Debut Fantasy Series

Sarah J. Maas’ acclaimed series, A Court of Thorns and Roses (ACOTAR), has garnered immense popularity within the romantasy genre. However, one aspect from her earlier series, Throne of Glass (TOG), could have further enriched its storytelling. While both series share remarkable female protagonists, exhilarating battles, and a diverse ensemble of characters, they differ significantly in narrative structure. ACOTAR uniquely adopts the perspective of its sole protagonist, Feyre, in contrast to the multiple points of view (POVs) presented throughout TOG.

The Case for Multi-POV Storytelling

Perhaps one of the most celebrated features of the Throne of Glass series lies in Maas’ decision to employ multiple POVs. This narrative technique allows readers to explore various characters and settings across its seven books, creating a richly layered world. In comparison, A Court of Thorns and Roses confines itself to Feyre’s perspective, potentially limiting the depth and expansiveness of its world-building.

Limitations on World-Building in ACOTAR

Throne of Glass book covers collage — Image courtesy of Yailin Chacon

While a singular perspective can create a sense of immediacy and intimacy, it also means that much of the surrounding action in ACOTAR happens off-stage. This can detract from the series’ potential for world-building. There are key moments within the series—such as Lucien’s expedition to the continent or Rhys’ encounters in battle—that would benefit from alternative perspectives, offering readers a more rounded understanding of the narrative and its stakes.

How Multi-POV Could Address ACOTAR’s Challenges

Maas may have chosen to limit ACOTAR to one POV to emphasize plot twists and surprises. Yet, the inclusion of additional perspectives could have effectively addressed some of the series’ notable challenges. For example, during the climactic battle against Hybern in the third book, readers are left in the dark regarding much of the action, as it’s felt predominantly through Feyre’s viewpoint. Key elements of chaos and confrontation are only captured through the perspective of the cauldron, creating gaps in the narrative experience.

Consequences of a Single POV

This heavy reliance on one character’s viewpoint may result in a storytelling experience that feels occasionally disjointed or stilted, with integral portions of the plot unfolding off-page. By broadening the narrative to include more character perspectives, Maas could enhance the complexity and engagement of the story, making it more immersive for readers.

Publication History of A Court of Thorns and Roses Series

Book Title	Release Date
A Court of Thorns and Roses	2015
A Court of Mist and Fury	2016
A Court of Wings and Ruin	2017
A Court of Frost and Starlight (novella)	2018
A Court of Silver Flames	2021
A Court of Thorns and Roses #6	TBC

In conclusion, while A Court of Thorns and Roses undoubtedly captivates readers, integrating a multi-POV structure reminiscent of Throne of Glass could lead to a richer, more complex story. The potential for deeper character exploration and enhanced world-building lays a path for exciting possibilities in the future installments of the series.

Source & Images